![]() I'm not quite sure what to make of antfs's terrible sustained read speed, but I ran the test several times on files located all over that drive. Sustained writes appear to be about 70% faster with ntfs3, and when you factor out the CPU core with pv itself, the CPU load for ntfs3 is about half that of antfs. This isn't an extensive test by any means. The CPU load was measured with htop on a 10-second average. Mt7621-based Netgear R6700v2 test platform with OpenWrt snapshot with a Seagate 8TB USB3 external archival drive (~150MB/s sustained write speed when connected to my laptop)ġ.00GiB 0:00:21 pv zero > /dev/nullġ.00GiB 0:01:28 100%ġ.00GiB 0:00:12 pv zero > /dev/nullġ.00GiB 0:00:11 100% Initial performance testing is encouragingly positive: Initial post was long, so I left out the preliminary testing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |